I’ve come to realize that the application process for international fellowships for independent scholars is a lot. Over the past few weeks, I feel like I’ve done nothing else but write for the Fulbright U.S. Scholar fellowship (barely thinking about the British Academy visiting fellowship). But it has helped me reflect on my business and prompted a few new ideas. I’m getting close to the end of the process with the Fulbright U.S. Scholar fellowship, and will soon start on the British Academy visiting fellowship application.
In this post, I’ll share updates from my application process, offering a behind-the-scenes look at what it takes to write a fellowship proposal as an independent scholar.
Table of Contents
ToggleRefining the Project Statement
After receiving feedback on my first draft of my Fulbright U.S. Scholar fellowship project statement from my collaborator at the host institution, it was time to cut and clean up. Her feedback was invaluable and helped me refine the timeline, scope, and methodology. Somehow, someway, I managed to get 17 pages down to 7, completely rewriting each section. A true Christmas morning miracle. Exhausted after a 20-hour journey from Dublin to Mexico City, I dedicated a full day to the rewriting process. I immersed myself in all the notes, her feedback, and various ideas as they came up. I took each section and each paragraph and rewrote it in a new document, folding in the feedback and new ideas.
And what came from this intensive work session? A cohesive, almost fully finalized project proposal! Together, we developed a project proposal to develop a novel coaching framework for research and science communication training. More on this idea later, but needless to say, we are very excited about the prospect of working together – theory and practice – to build a new approach to helping scholars navigate public engagement and research and science communication. I sent the updated version to my host contact and scheduled a call with her to review and talk about the next steps!
Related Post: Engagement Coaches: A New Approach to Science Communication Training
Navigating the Next Steps
I had a follow-up call with my host contact two days after completing the updated Fulbright project statement. She was excited about the progress, saying that it read well. We discussed our respective next steps.
On her end, there are several moving parts: a research team, a grant from a New Zealand research center, and a related project already in the works that I am now potentially joining but need the approval of the research team. All of this needs to align within a week. The team needs to approve both me and the project. I can only assume they will have notes for me and the project statement but my host is confident it’ll go smoothly given our close collaboration. For me, this means a quick turnaround – I’ll need to incorporate any notes within days.
Meanwhile, I need to draft the host institution’s letter of invitation. I’ve requested that the research center co-sign with the university to strengthen my application. To make this happen, I need to provide the institution with my CV, final project statement, and other relevant information. Fortunately, the letter has an extended due date beyond the main application for 10 days, so we have a bit of wiggle room.
And now, on to the rest of the Fulbright U.S. Scholar fellowship application.
Application Components for the Fulbright U.S. Scholar Fellowship
CV: Showcasing Relevant Experience
The CV for the Fulbright U.S. Scholar fellowship application has a 6-page limit, which I used strategically to highlight my relevant professional experience. I wanted to highlight three key areas – coaching, research, and communication.
As an independent scholar, I needed to clearly demonstrate my qualifications, particularly my communications experience. The application requires a minimum of 7 years of experience, which I’ve met through my current business and previous work in public relations and marketing, but I need to make sure this is obvious in my materials.
To further strengthen my application, I included:
- A comprehensive list of professional development and workshops I’ve attended in the past 5-6 years that shows my education and growth in coaching, science communication, and facilitation.
- Details about my travel coaching training. While not directly applicable to this project, it demonstrates formal coaching credentials, which are relevant to the project.
- Extensive information about my current role as a research communications trainer and consultant, highlighting the work I’ve done and its relevance to the project.
I’m still considering whether to include my published research. While I have space for it, the publications aren’t directly relevant to this project, and I’ve already listed my research accomplishments in the body of the CV. I am also thinking about elaborating more on how I developed my coaching framework, as this is a key part of my proposed project. I will see what my reviewers suggest.
Essays
The initial drafts of my Fulbright U.S. Scholar fellowship essays were born during a 5-hour flight from Mexico City to Toronto. With no Wi-Fi and nowhere to go, I poured out my thoughts. The application requires three personal essays:
Country Selection: Why is this country (or countries) the best match for your project? What experiences have prepared you to undertake your project in this country (countries)? Please describe your prior experiences in the host country/countries (if any).
Career Trajectory: How will this Fulbright award fit into your career path and future goals? What is the trajectory you have followed, and what are your plans for the future?
Cultural Preparation: Please address your familiarity with the host culture, and any other global experiences that prepare you to adjust successfully to life in the host country. What challenges do you expect to face as a foreign national in the host country? How will you adapt, address, or manage them? Provide examples of your ability to be adaptable, flexible, culturally sensitive, collegial, and how you may serve as a cultural ambassador for the U.S.
These essays flowed pretty naturally for me. My previous visit to New Zealand made it easy to discuss my cultural experiences there. Additionally, my life as a traveling scholar-entrepreneur provided lots of reference material for addressing cultural adaptation for international fellowships for independent scholars.
Related Post: A Week In The Life Of A Traveling Scholarpreneur
After letting the essays sit for a week, I revisited them to finalize. I used AI to refine the writing, then rewrote sections and incorporated new ideas. I noticed some crossover in what I wrote between the country selection and cultural preparation essays, which I worked to differentiate and clarify.
Reference List
I’ve been building my reference list as I developed my Fulbright U.S. Scholar fellowship project statement. This isn’t just a bibliography of cited works or a list of my own publications (not that these are relevant here at all). It’s a curated collection of literature that showcases awareness of the current state of research or work related to the discipline of the proposed project. It can include books, conference proceedings, websites, journal articles, etc.
The list is meant to demonstrate:
- My comprehensive knowledge of the field to the review committee.
- How my proposed project will contribute to and build upon existing work in the discipline.
Fortunately, I’ve been reading science communication literature since I started my business, giving me a solid foundation to draw from. Shoutout to me for pulling all this research, having the foresight to save it and annotate it in Evernote, making it super easy for me to come up with relevant research.
Recommenders
After finalizing my Fulbright U.S. Scholar fellowship project statement, CV, and essays – a process that took longer than expected – I added my recommenders to the application. The recommenders need to address my professional experience, the proposed project, and its relevance, so having these documents ready was crucial.
I needed two recommenders – one from my current place of employment and one from within my discipline. As an independent scholar, this one was tricky, but I got clarification from the Fulbright people that a current client (who can speak on my current place of employment) and a former colleague (who can speak on my work within my previous discipline) would work.
To support my recommenders, I provided them with:
- A link to my company website, showcasing our mission, vision, values, and client testimonials
- My CV
- The Fulbright essays
- The project statement
- A draft recommendation letter for reference
I included a draft letter to respect their time, given the relatively short turnaround (about two weeks). But I made it clear that using the draft was entirely optional – it’s there to offer a starting point or for additional information if needed.
I’ll follow up with my recommenders in a week to ensure they’re on track and to address any questions they might have.
Seeking Feedback
After countless revisions, I’ve reached a point where I need someone else to read the Fulbright U.S. Scholar fellowship materials. One thing I am trying to be better about these international fellowships for independent scholars this go-around (I previously applied for an AAAS fellowship) is to have a few people read over my materials. I’ve enlisted three trusted friends to review my Fulbright U.S. Scholar fellowship application materials, providing them with:
- All my application documents
- The review criteria
- Country-specific award information
- Key expectations for the New Zealand award
It will be incredibly valuable to have people outside the science communication discipline review my materials to assess the jargon and general project idea. While one reviewer is a former coaching client, offering some insider insight, they’re still removed from the specifics of science communication.
I’ve emphasized that Fulbright is looking for answers to four crucial questions across all materials: why this country; why this project; why me; and why now? Additionally, I’ve highlighted the specific expectations for the New Zealand award:
- Project should have bilateral value for both the U.S. and New Zealand
- Benefits and relevance to the United States must be articulated
- Preference for projects that:
- Significantly benefit New Zealand
- Interest and value New Zealand scholars
- Require access to unique New Zealand resources or institutions
I’ve requested their feedback within a week, recognizing the need to balance continued refinement with the value of external input. As the submission deadline approaches for the Fulbright U.S. Scholar fellowship, I’m considering asking 1-2 reviewers for a final look after incorporating their initial feedback.
Reflection on Applying for International Fellowships for Independent Scholars
I’ve come to realize that many international fellowships for independent scholars are often about researchers going somewhere, conducting research alone, and gaining some local insights before moving on. But I’m approaching the Fulbright U.S. Scholar fellowship and British Academy international fellowships differently, especially as an independent scholar. I’m not just looking to do research; I want to collaborate and contribute meaningfully.
This work isn’t a necessity for me. I want to contribute to the field and get paid for it. I feel like I have much to contribute given my academic background and current career trajectory. Without funding, this project is not feasible for me given the time and energy it requires. But these international fellowships for independent scholars are an incredible opportunity to give back to the discipline, expand my knowledge, learn more about science communication in a different culture, grow my professional network, and deepen my understanding of the work.
And, I cannot deny this. The process of brainstorming and writing for this application has been so enjoyable… so much so that I am *missing* academia ever so slightly. I’ve prioritized this work over everything else, not just because of the deadline, but because it’s brought me joy. There’s nothing else I’d rather be doing right now.
Related Post: Unpacking Science Communication at the PCST Mexico Symposium: A Reflection on Language, Reflexivity, and Praxis
Next Steps: Leveraging the Project Idea
With the Fulbright U.S. Scholar fellowship application well underway, I want to capitalize on the writing and the research to extend this project idea into other opportunities.
I intend to submit two abstracts for the PCST Conference in Aberdeen, Scotland next May. One will be based on the Fulbright U.S. Scholar fellowship project, and the other will focus on my British Academy fellowship idea (which means I need to finalize this idea ASAP). I’m writing several blog posts to further develop and share the project idea.
The British Academy visiting fellowship is my next major focus. I need to start planning this application, building on the work I’ve done for the Fulbright U.S. Scholar fellowship proposal.
As for the Fulbright application, here are the final steps:
- Wait for feedback from the New Zealand research team
- Follow up with recommenders
- Incorporate feedback from reviewer friends
- Finalize all documents
- Submit before September 16th
The end is near! I’m excited to see how this project idea evolves across these different platforms and opportunities. It’s a busy few weeks ahead, but I’m pumped!
Advice for International Fellowships for Independent Scholars
- Know when to stop editing and solicit feedback. After countless revisions, getting external perspectives to improve your application is crucial.
- In the same vein, allow time between drafts. Letting your materials sit for a day or 2 can provide a fresh perspective for revisions. It also gives you space for new ideas to pop up.
- People are often more willing to help than you might expect. Don’t hesitate to ask trusted friends or colleagues to review your materials.
- Leverage your work across multiple opportunities, especially as an independent scholar. If you’ve put significant effort into a project idea, consider how you can adapt it for conferences, blog posts, your profession, etc.
- Provide context to your reviewers. Share relevant criteria and expectations to help them give more targeted feedback. Give them as much as possible. Same with your recommenders.
- Be strategic with your CV. Use the space limitations to highlight experiences most relevant to your proposed project. Where I wanted to write more in the project statement, I expounded upon in my CV.
Looking for information about other international fellowships for independent scholars? Check out my previous posts in this series about the Fulbright application process.
Life After Academia: Exploring International Fellowships for Independent Scholars
International Fellowships for Independent Scholars: Finding a Host Institution
Solidifying A Host Institution for International Fellowships for Independent Scholars
Starting the Application Process: International Fellowships for Independent Scholars
Writing the Application: International Fellowships for Independent Scholars
International Fellowships for Independent Scholars: Racing to the British Academy Deadline






